Michael Heagle
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • FILMOGRAPHY
  • Articles
  • In Development
  • SHOP

Michael's Musings on Mostly Movies

Synthesizers and Saxophones Interview -- Part 2

3/31/2021

 
Picture
Who is the intended audience for the book?
 
When I got out of college I moved to LA for a bit, and picked up a copy of Michael Weldon’s Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film. It’s a huge compilation of capsule reviews of “Drive-in” style movies, and as a result of reading that book, I made my first feature film and haven’t looked back. I hope that somebody stumbles on this, sees some movies that they wouldn’t otherwise, and become strangely inspired to make their own thing the same way I did. Art is self-perpetuating, and who knows what would come of watching a double bill of Dirty Dancing and Howard the Duck, or The Lost Boys and Breakfast Club? Either way I think I’d watch the lovechild of those in a hot second.
 
Do you have any favorite parts of the book?
 
I was able to write about a couple of things I feel really strongly about. Queen’s music for Flash Gordon – it was the first cassette I ever got, I had that thing memorized. I got to write about Purple Rain, probably my favorite soundtrack album of all time. I got to spread the love about some lesser known films that I admire, like Alex Cox’s Straight to Hell that stars a ton of English musicians, and Streets of Fire, a kind of retro-50s-gang-movie-meets-MTV flick.
 
What’s next? Do you think there will be a second edition, and what would you like it to contain?
 
The next thing I’m going to do is a book on the horror films of 1988. Because of the horror boom in the mid 1980s, following successes like Nightmare on Elm Street, there were something like 70 horror films released that year, and tons of them are great. I was in college at UW-Milwaukee and obsessed with horror movies around that time, so it’s another dip in the well of nostalgia for me. Now, with DVD and Blu-Ray and occasionally streaming services, you can find quite a lot of these things and watch them. For Synthesizers and Saxophones, I actually found myself buying some of the films on VHS via eBay just to get good-looking copies, though, which sounds really backwards. 
 
Why are your memories of synthesizer music so strong?
 
I was raised on 60s and 70s music – my dad listened to The Beatles, The Eagles, Steve Miller. Synth solos in 70s songs were always the strangest part of the tune – Heart’s “Magic Man” kicks in with that thick Moog thing for a moment and it takes it into another world. But when the 80s rolled around I finally had my own music. I distinctly remember the eerie experience of hearing Pink Floyd’s “Another Brick in the Wall,” then the slightly haunting early songs of The Police like “Spirits in the Material World.” They were slightly cinematic. Then music videos hit and those specific pictures and those specific songs were permanently melded.
 
Like every kid of that era I loved Star Wars, but somehow Flash Gordon spoke to me even more – the operatic Freddie Mercury vocal, the soaring Brian May guitar, the satin jumpsuits and art-deco models. Between cinema experiences of that era, and songs playing on the radio, and the MTV-like music video anthology shows on Saturday morning TV… We were immersed in it, it was the sound of my adolescence. And it’s still some of my favorite music, and people working today in that retro sound still capture some of the magic of it.
 
What is it about the music industry and the movie industry that made this a worthy subject for a book?
 
The music industry seems so splintered now – and “pop” kind of seems absent from the landscape. Certainly, the number of great hit songs that debut in mainstream movies is much lower than it was when films like Flashdance and Footloose appeared, with albums that stayed in the charts for half a year. Best you can hope for is an 80s song trotted out as an ironic joke – or like the new Captain Marvel, where the whole soundtrack is 90s tunes because it’s a period film.
 
The book goes into the economic motivations that brought pop music and movies together. MTV was big, pop music had become a big money maker with the now-affluent teenage set who would not only buy the records but the entire Madonna-wanna-be ensembles. The 80s didn’t invent the rock and roll movie, but with the advent of cable and VCRs new markets opened up and producers saw dollar signs.

But, pop music and movies had some kind of a falling out. They just don’t make it like they used to. Take Ghostbusters: when was the last time you sang the title of a movie? In the book there’s a Billboard chart from 1985 where the top three songs are occupied by movie songs (St Elmo’s Fire, Power of Love from Back to the Future, and Tina Turner’s song for Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome). Has that happened since?

Total media synergy before that was a buzzword. It was starting to be more and more common then, I can think of one other example from The Last Dragon where a martial arts movie basically stops to show an entire DeBarge music video. But the thing was produced by Berry Gordy, basically the godfather of Motown, with an eye on the music’s bottom line.

Typically the reverse was true – MTV ran tons of songs-from-movies where the music video was the footage of the artist intercut with scenes from the film. Then you couldn’t help but see the financial motivation – or not! Maybe the music was wholly inseparable and aesthetically linked to the content at the molecular level! When those were good, they were great. Look up Billy Ocean’s “When The Going Gets Tough” from Jewel of the Nile. We needed Danny Devito, Michael Douglas, and Kathleen Turner singing backup in a white tuxedo! It’s sheer exuberance at its best. Or the cameos in the video for “Ghostbusters,” or all the music videos that Freddy Krueger was in. I love and live for movies, the only thing I like just as much is music. Put those together with a sense of humor and I’m in heaven, man.

Synthesizers and Saxophones Interview, Part 1

3/31/2021

 
Writer Michael Heagle answers some frank questions about the making of his book, Synthesizers and Saxophone (2019)

What was the “ah-hah!” moment that made you decide to write the book?


The book started innocuously enough. I caught myself watching and re-watching the 1984 breakdancing film Breakin’ and its sequel, the infamously-titled Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo. I approached them non-ironically, just enjoying them for the dance work and as a snapshot of a particular period I was fond of. I was listening to the soundtracks, seeking out posters and lobby cards and autographs and other memorabilia but I found there wasn’t really a book on the subject – my usual go-to for collecting on a movie subject. So I said, “how hard could it be?” and wrote a short article about them, then added one of the other films from that short-lived trend – Beat Street. Soon I found there were even more of these that I hadn’t heard of, and the book escalated from there. You add early Rap movies and suddenly you have a chapter – but not quite a book.
 

What was the creation/research process like? How did you gather materials and piece everything together, even having to “cherry-pick” what you used?  

The most dangerous thing was that every piece of research led to another film, and another and another. Scouring YouTube for interviews on one film suddenly had me discovering dozens of other movies, some just sitting there in their entirety. I quickly realized I had seen almost nothing from this decade except the hits and the occasional, accidental B-movie. But it was a great revelation. I loved the films of the period, and the knowledge that there were still hundreds of bad and hilarious things I hadn’t seen? That was like discovering a $100 bill in a jacket pocket.
 
The idea of leaving things out of the book was a practical decision – I didn’t want to spend more than a year on the project, nor for it to balloon up to some impractical length. By putting it through the certain criteria, I was able to edit myself before I got into trouble. Was the film a traditional musical, where people broke into song? If those songs were in a 1980s idiom, it went in. So, a disco film like Xanadu or Can’t Stop the Music, which came out in 1980, didn’t make the cut, but something like Earth Girls Are Easy or the ridiculous Voyage of the Rock Aliens was in. A film where an aspect of the music business was shown, like Krush Groove, is the perfect movie for this book – you’ve got essential artists like Sheila E and Run D.M.C and Fat Boys and The Beastie Boys performing in it, so it’s a movie and it’s pop music and you’re off and running. Is Madonna in the movie – yes? Is it Shanghai Surprise, where it’s set in the 1940s and she doesn’t sing any songs – it’s out. 
 
I also just tackled things I thought would make the table of contents sound funny and compelling, so you have a chapter about songs in action movies called “Songs for a Muscular Activity,” and “Danger Zone: the Importance of Being Kenny (Loggins).” Maybe the best one is “Modern Earth Girls that Desperately Want to Have Fun.”


Were there any challenges/writer’s blocks?
​

It was easy and it was fun, but mentally strenuous. I’d pick out a few movies to work on for the week, watch them with a notebook and jot some ideas down, kind of get a synopsis and movie review sort of take on the material, then take a day to research the music and write the chapter. So every movie in the book only took a day or two, and maybe a little time to go back and make sense out of it. 

The challenge was working exclusively with second hand sources – it would have been a lot more fun to sit down with Giorgio Moroder for an afternoon, or chat with David Lee Roth about his failed attempt at making a “Diamond Dave” feature film right after he left Van Halen. Maybe the next one will have more firsthand interviews, but this one was at a distinct disadvantage – John Hughes, Prince, David Bowie – a lot of these guys aren’t around anymore. Being outside the entertainment industry and working out of the Midwest instead of Los Angeles makes it harder, too.


Picture

Four Writing Lessons from John Carpenter's PRINCE OF DARKNESS Screenplay

9/1/2020

 
Picture
Efficiency in storytelling is like any other art form. Take music, for example. Some really sparse songs are fantastic, sometimes you need 48 tracks of overdubs.

When it comes to screenwriting, I would say I try to take after my filmmaking idol John Carpenter. It's a classic, ultra-sparse Hollywood style of show don't tell. Here's four ways JC (working under the nom de plume of Martin Quatermass) shows his skill at keeping things tight in the screenplay for 1987's PRINCE OF DARKNESS. Read the Screenplay Here

  1. You must describe in order to provide the picture, but not in the way that prose does. The screenplay opens in something called INT SENTINEL'S BEDROOM - NIGHT which is then described: "A tiny bedroom. Priest's cell. Spare. Moody shadows from the window. A large cross on the wall." This is reporting the facts of the room. Only two opinions in there, "spare" could be up for debate and "moody" is a matter of opinion. Prior to that he says that there's "dark electronic music." Sort of a note to self, but anybody who's seen a Carpenter flick will know what he means. So break that up and you see he's got the whole room in two lines, and also even suggests a pattern of cutting with the short jabs of sentences. "Priest's cell" makes a comment about the guy's existence -- prisoner of God or prisoner to his sect and his secret about the Devil -- as well as being physically descriptive. Two words. He reminds the cinematographer it's a horror film: "moody shadows." He reminds the art department to get a cross for the wall. And we're out.
  2. Pictures equal words. If it's something we'd recognize with little effort, spend little effort. Same script: EXT UNIVERSITY CAMPUS DAY "An idyllic campus. Charming ivy-covered buildings. STUDENTS stroll the grounds." We've been there a million times. Also this is the character's Ordinary World so we want a sense of normalcy, and we got it. It takes as long to read that sentence as the shot would be held on screen. Now if you want to draw out an establishing for pacing purposes, you could. say right after a thrilling scene you want to bring the reader back down, you could take an extra word or two.
  3. Tell departments what they need to know. Later the church is described "immense. Gothic. Its spires sweep upward into the sky." It's a wish list for the location scout. Who wasn't able to find that because there's no abandoned Gothic in Los Angeles. But you have shots and tone. Suggests a low angle looking up, for sure, without saying it.
  4. Get the characters across fast. Carpenter calls Donald Pleasence's character PRIEST. He's described as "PRIEST, 50's." Probably knew he was going to cast him. Plus, what are you going to describe, the black outfit and collar? He's a priest. If he didn't know who he was going to cast, he'd probably have to try harder. "Brian Marsh, 24, a graduate student in physics, newly arrived on campus, walks down a sunlit courtyard carrying an armload of textbooks." My inclination would be to leave out "newly arrived on campus" because we can't see the past -- or can we? What does a newly-arrived student look like? It's outfit, action, demeanor.. .Lots in one phrase.

​I'm inclined to put the exact effort necessary on the page. It's a document to get you to the screen, not a stand-alone work of art. It's like fancy fonts on an architectural blueprint. Or, it's like putting expensive aftermarket spoilers and stuff on a shitty import car. I want my screenplay to be a 71 Plymouth Barracuda. Just a monster under the hood. In short -- make the "What Happens" be so amazing that it doesn't require embellishment.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • FILMOGRAPHY
  • Articles
  • In Development
  • SHOP